|
EDUCATIONAL HELPS ...
Assistive Technology
-
A publication of the National Dissemination Center
for Children with Disabilities
-
NICHCY News Digest #ND13
-
1989 Resources Updated, April 1996
-
Approx. 32 pages when printed.
-
PDF version
Note: This publication was originally released in
1989 and, as such, does not contain the most current
information on assistive technology. NICHCY offers
this document on the Internet with the caveat that,
while readers can gain basic information about
assistive technology from this document, it is
important that they supplement this overview with
more current readings from other sources. To help you
do so, we have updated many of the resource listings
that appear at the end of this document. These
listings will help you identify organizations that
provide information and assistance on assistive
technology, as well as books and articles that have
recently been published on the subject.
Raising a child with a disability presents families
and professionals with many challenges. Today, one of
the major challenges facing people who care for and
about children and youth with disabilities is
technology -- what to get, where to get it, how to
use it, how to pay for it, how to evaluate its
effectiveness, and where to put it.
Technology is receiving the attention of families,
advocates, legislators, and professionals due to its
potential for enhancing the lives of individuals with
disabilities. From computers to communication devices
to environmental controls, the world of technology
offers many children and adolescents with
disabilities the tools necessary to be more
successful in school, at work, and at achieving
independence in daily living. Indeed, opportunities
unthought of ten years ago are now becoming available
to some children with disabilities with the
assistance of new technology, and rumors of emerging
technology are raising new hopes.
Yet, the diversity of available technology, its ever
changing nature, the lack of general sophistication
regarding it, and the decisions to be made prior to
purchase, prompt many and continuous questions.
During the time this NEWS DIGEST was being developed,
the staff of the National Information Center for
Children and Youth with Disabilities (NICHCY) found
that much information does exist on all issues
related to the choice and purchase of any piece of
technology; much of the information is, however, of
varying degrees of readability, in many and disparate
places, and often requires the skills of a super
sleuth to uncover or decode.
With all of this in mind, and after much
deliberation, we at NICHCY decided that the best way
to serve you, our readers, was to develop a NEWS
DIGEST on some of the most important issues about
assistive technology identified from your questions
to NICHCY over the last 18 months. In truth, the
articles presented are intended only to help you
begin your journey through the "technology
maze." Resources are included to assist you as
you continue your journey.
Thus, from stacks of information, we have herein
presented selected accounts. This information is the
most basic and least changeable. We sincerely hope
the information in this issue is helpful to you.
Please let us know.
Back to top
by Elizabeth Lahm and Sue Elting
The Center for Special Education Technology
The Council for Exceptional Children Reston,
Virginia
Today, a nonverbal child speaks with the help of an
electronic communication aid. A student with learning
disabilities masters math facts using a computer
game. A child with vision problems can benefit from
an inexpensive device that enlarges printed words on
the computer screen. And for more severe vision
problems, there are speech synthesizers that can be
used with computers to convert typewritten words or
text into an electronic voice.
For the child who has a physical disability, there
are special devices that will allow him or her to
input information into the computer without using the
conventional keyboard. This can be done through the
use of a single switch or some type of voice
recognition system. There are other alternative input
devices that can be used simply by touching the
computer screen or touching points on a
touch-sensitive tablet that correspond to the points
on the computer screen.
Computer and other technologies have expanded and
enriched lives and given many children with
disabilities options not imagined a decade ago. As
there is a wide array of assistive technology, so too
are there many decisions, choices and options for
families and professionals. Making informed decisions
about technology is a challenge that many consumers
will encounter in coming years. Resources are
available to assist consumers such as: current
periodicals; disability, parent, and professional
organizations; national technology centers; and
private companies. Walking the assistive technology
maze can be made less complex and confusing by
understanding the implications of technology in the
lives of children and youth with disabilities, and by
knowing where to go for help.
Then and Now
In the late 1800s, the population of the U.S. was
growing rapidly. Census information, gathered by
hand, resulted in long delays and inaccuracy in the
information reported about the nation's
population. In fact, the 1880 census took eight years
to count. Estimates at that time indicated that if
the census process continued in the same manner, the
1890 census would take twelve years to complete and
the 1930 census would be available in 1985.
Help arrived in the form of the 1890 Census Machine
developed by John Shaw Billings and Herman Hollerith.
The 1890 census took three years to complete and
computerization was underway. Hollerith turned to big
business to market the invention, now called the
Tabulating Machine. He joined a company that
eventually called itself International Business
Machines (IBM). IBM joined with Harvard in 1938 to
create the first electronic computer, the Mark I. The
Mark I required 46,000 vacuum tubes to perform its
operations.
The ENIAC computer, completed in 1947, weighed 30
tons, stood nine feet tall, and took up 1,500 square
feet. In 1951 the UNIVAC computer was completed.
Weighing in at a mere 3 tons and occupying only 575
square feet, UNIVAC was the first computer to handle
numbers and words. Commercially produced computers
continued to evolve, with more power packed into less
space at a lower price.
In 1973, the first computer chip, the 8080, was
manufactured by Intel. Less than a square inch in
area and thin as cardboard, this chip can perform a
million calculations per second (like the ENIAC) but
only costs about $4 to purchase. These chips are
inexpensive because their main ingredient is silicon,
which is more common than sand, and they are produced
in enormous quantities (Budoff, Thormann, and Gras,
1985).
Computers were the beginning of the new information
technology. Information (facts, knowledge, data, and
news) technology (materials, tools, systems and
techniques) is the key to economic growth. It is
likely to bring about substantial changes in society
and may change lives -- for better or worse -- in a
very short time. It will improve the quality of life
for many people by making information more accessible
and providing more information at a low cost which
will increase opportunities for all. The greatest
gain will be to the educationally disadvantaged,
among them, students with disabilities (Hawkridge,
Vincent, and Hales, 1985).
The interest in using computer technology with people
with disabilities began in October 1981 with the
Johns Hopkins First National Search for Applications
of Personal Computing to Aid the Handicapped. In
November 1980, the Applied Physics Laboratory at The
Johns Hopkins University began a national search for
applications of personal computing to aid the
handicapped. Enthusiastic responses from
professionals, amateurs, and students resulted in
introductory workshops and regional fairs, and
culminated in an exhibit of the top national entries
at the National Academy of Sciences, an awards
ceremony in Washington, D.C., and a two-day workshop
on computing for the handicapped at Johns Hopkins in
October 1981.
In March 1983, The Council for Exceptional Children
held its First National Conference on the Use of
Microcomputers in Education. This conference
reflected the need for basic workshops on
microcomputer use and for information on practical
applications of computers in special education. In
1983 CEC/ERIC published: Microcomputers in Special
Education by Florence M. Tabor; The Exceptional
Parent magazine published its first annual technology
issue; and the IEEE held its first Computer Society
Workshop on Computers in the Education and Employment
of the Handicapped.
1984 saw the first U.S. Office of Special Education
Programs (OSEP) document published by COSMOS
Corporation: Microcomputer Implementation in Schools
by Robert K. Yin and J. Lunne White. The document
described and analyzed the use of microcomputers in
the schools and district offices of 12 school
districts. In September, 1984, Closing The Gap held
its first conference on Computer Technology for the
Handicapped. A 1985 OSEP publication, Robotics,
Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation: Future
Applications in Special Education, by Gwendolyn B.
Moore, Robert K. Yin, and Elizabeth A. Lahm,
identified ways in which technologies might be used
to help special education students in the future.
The vehicle for introducing technological devices for
educational use was put into place in 1975 with the
passage of the Education of the Handicapped Act
(EHA), P.L.94-142. Increased federal interest was
demonstrated with the passage of the Amendments to
the Education of the Handicapped Act of 1986, P.L.
99-457. These amendments created a new Part G
designed to promote the use of new technology, media,
and materials in the education of students with
disabilities. Discretionary grants under this new
authority were targeted to:
-
assess usage and promote effectiveness;
-
design and adapt new technology, media, and
materials;
-
assist public and private sectors in development
and marketing; and
-
disseminate information.
More recently, the Technology-Related Assistance for
Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988, P.L.
100-407, was signed into law. The primary purpose of
the act is to assist states in developing and
implementing statewide programs of technology-related
assistance for meeting the needs of individuals with
disabilities. The program will enable individuals
with disabilities to acquire assistive technology
devices and services. Over a three year period, all
states will have the opportunity to get federal
assistance for developing and establishing their
statewide program.
The legislation refers to technology-related
assistance and allows each state to decide what is
meant by technology-related assistance. The term does
include, however, two separate components: services
and devices.
Assistive devices are not a new area of interest
created by the new law. As shown above, interest in
the new higher technologies began shortly after the
silicon chip invention. Prior to that, low technology
assistive devices were being developed and used for
centuries. Consequently, definitions of what an
assistive device is are numerous, and are often based
on the perspective of a specific agency or disability
group.
The wide variety of assistive devices, and their
applications to children and youth with disabilities,
is currently receiving a great deal of attention from
many disability-related fields. This flurry of
activity stems from the potential that new and
emerging technologies hold for individuals with
disabilities to lead full and independent lives. The
cases below provide only a few examples of the
versatility and application of technology and their
benefits.
Technology Applications
Case 1: A high school student
with a visual impairment in a Current Events class
has an assignment to follow a recent major event,
present available facts about it, write a report, and
complete a presentation about the event to his
classmates. A major source of information for his
sighted classmates is the newspaper, but unless
someone reads it to him, he cannot use that source.
The radio is an available option, but typically radio
news coverage contains too little detail. With the
available computer technologies, though, he can
receive the newspaper on a computer disk and, using
his personal computer equipped with synthesized
speech, he can auditorily scan the newspaper, find
relevant articles, and have the computer read them to
him. Using the same computer, he can begin to write
his paper, print it out in braille so he can check it
and change it if necessary, and then print it in
standard text to hand into his teacher.
Case 2: An adolescent with
quadraparalysis shows all the signs of becoming a
teenager. She wants control of her own life: to
decide which radio station to listen to, to decide
when to turn the reading light off at night, to call
her friends and have a private conversation, and to
stay home alone when her parents go out. Without
assistive devices she would be unable to be an
independent teenager, but with a single switch
connected to an environmental control unit and placed
on her head, she can control her personal radio, turn
the lights on and off, access the telephone for
calling friends, and call for emergency help when her
parents are out.
Case 3: A toddler with severe
disabilities attends a special education preschool
program. The teachers are unable to determine the
child's cognitive abilities because the child has
no verbal skills and very few motor skills. In the
past, teachers had few ideas for appropriate
educational programs for this type of child. As a
result of available technologies, the child's
educational program includes motor training, language
and communication training, and teachers can more
easily see the child's potential and can build on
it. Now the teachers are working on training him to
use a consistent motor response using switches and
battery-operated toys. The child is learning to reach
and touch a switch which turns on a battery-operated
teddy bear. Other times the child has two or three
switches to choose from and must decide which toy is
preferable. The language therapist is using the same
switches to teach the child to make consistent
"yes" and "no" responses for
communication.
Computers for Home Use
Many of the computers purchased each year are bought
for use in the home. Well over 50% of home computer
owners report that the major reason for buying a
computer is for educational applications. Exactly how
computers are used depends on the software selected.
Depending on the design and content, software can
present new skills or concepts, reinforce previously
learned skills, or require the learner to apply
skills to a task or problem. Educational software
generally falls into four categories: drill and
practice, tutorial, simulations, and games. Tool
software such as word processing are another option.
Each type of software can be used for instruction at
home.
Drill and Practice. These
programs provide opportunities for the child to
practice previously learned skills. The content of
the drill and practice program is usually structured,
focusing on a specific sequence or kind of
skill-building. For many students with disabilities,
drill and practice activities are very important for
mastering skills, and using this kind of software at
home can reinforce learning that takes place at
school.
Tutorials. These programs
introduce new skills or concepts. It is assumed that
the learner has not been introduced to the material
presented in the software. The child may have learned
related skills, but the content of the software is
essentially new. Because the content is new, the
learner will need guidance and supervision which aids
understanding and teaches correct use from the
beginning.
Simulations. Simulations are a
type of problem-solving software. The learner applies
skills and information that they have mastered.
Simulations place learners in real life situations.
The learner applies rules, uses facts, and draws
conclusions to solve a problem. In addition to
academic skills, simulations require good
coordination and keyboarding ability. The necessary
academic and physical skills should be assessed when
considering this type of program for a child with a
disability.
Games. Computer-based games can
be either drill and practice or problem-solving
activities. Arcade-style games are usually drill and
practice programs. The learner practices skills by
competing with the program in which facts or problems
are presented. The learner is timed and gets points
for giving the correct answer within the time limit.
Tool Software. This software
helps the user find, organize, and reorganize
information. Word processing programs, database
management systems, and music or graphics editors are
all examples of tool software. No content is
specified with tool software. Instead, the program
provides a framework for writing, creating files, or
drawing. To use a word processing program or a
spreadsheet, the learner must become familiar with
its features. Tool programs are more versatile for
home use than drill and practice or tutorial programs
and family members can use them for different
purposes.
Many possibilities exist for computer learning at
home. Yet, because of differences in age, skills, and
interests, few products will appeal to all members of
the family. Knowing how your child learns and thinks
about his or her strengths or weaknesses is important
for it can affect learning.
Selecting Assistive Technology
Equipment: Becoming Informed
Technology is an investment. Therefore, consumers
should become more informed and critical of the
limitations of technology. Consumers should also be
aware of alternate possibilities for achieving a
specific goal.
In addition to standard considerations such as cost,
available software, expandability, ease of use, and
available peripherals, it is also important to
consider how adaptable the hardware is. For students
with special needs, adaptability in most types of
materials is necessary. For example, students with
physical disabilities might need to use switches
which are operated by a head movement, a head wand, a
foot switch, an eye blink, or a sip and puff method.
Students with a visual impairment may need a speech
synthesizer. For students with a moderate disability,
a combination of speech synthesis and alternative
inputs may be necessary. For students with behavioral
or attention disabilities, timing is important. In
addition, a special feature that is essential to
these students is just how fast the computer can load
programs from the disk.
Fortunately, there is a wealth of information that
parents and professionals can access, thus allowing
them to make informed choices about the products they
purchase and the services they select.
1. Where to Begin. If you are
interested in using computers or assistive technology
with your child but do not know where to being, start
by reading general information on the subject. There
are books available as well as publications, some of
which are specific to special needs.
2. School and Community
Services. Print information alone may not be
enough to help you with your technology decisions.
You may need to contact agencies and organizations
that provide special services. To do this, first
become aware of resources that exist in your
community. Local resources can supply personalized
assistance to fit technology to your child.
Perhaps the most important community resource is the
school. Your child's teacher can often help you
assess the potential of using technology at home
given your child's needs. The teacher may also be
able to guide you in selecting appropriate software
for your child. Some districts allow parents to
borrow computer equipment for home use.
Another local resource is a computer users'
group. User groups can provide valuable information
about the use of software and hardware. Technical
questions can be answered by members who are
experienced with both. Check with your local computer
dealer or telephone directory to find a user group in
your area. Computer manufacturers may also know of a
local user group.
3. Specific Information. If you
are looking for information about using technology
with a child with a specific disability, try
contacting the local chapter of the disability
organization serving that population. For example, if
your child has a learning disability, contact the
local Learning Disabilities Association of America
(LDAA).
Other organizations like the Easter Seal Society and
the United Cerebral Palsy Association often provide
direct services to families and to local schools in
the use of technology.
Given the number and different types of computers
that are available today, it is almost impossible to
do a comparison. Generally, though, one or two
factors tend to influence your decision to purchase
particular equipment. These factors might include
specific software compatibility, cost, or
compatibility with other computers in the school.
Some questions to ask when considering a computer
system are:
-
Do the software programs you plan to use run on
this computer?
-
Is the amount of memory of the computer sufficient
to operate the software you plan to use?
-
Can the memory be expanded?
-
Is a color monitor necessary?
-
Does the software you plan to use work with the
printer?
-
Can the printer print graphics?
-
How much will the total computer system cost
(including monitor, printer, disk drives)?
While you may not be able to afford all the options
you want initially, think of the future. You will
want a computer that can be useful in a number of
situations and can be adapted to suit different
needs.
4. Hardware. Hardware
information may be harder to find locally. Computer
dealers that sell computer systems can usually be
found in most cities. Companies that sell assistive
or adaptive equipment may need to be contacted
directly.
5. Software. Your local public
library can be a gold mine for information on
computer software. Some libraries set up mini
computer labs for the public use.
Another source for software information is your local
computer store. National chains such as B. Dalton and
Egghead carry a good selection of instructional
software for all ages. Some software companies cater
to the home market. Scholastic and Broderbund issue
home market catalogs so you can shop by mail.
Some parents may be able to contact special software
preview centers, operated by school districts or
universities. Since most of these preview centers
cater to teachers, call first to make sure parents
are welcome.
6. Assistive Technology. If you
don't know what assistive equipment is needed,
local hospitals and community rehabilitation or
vocational centers may be active in designing and
fitting assistive devices to complement your
child's capabilities. Some states have
established centers to provide information about
particular devices.
7. Funding. Finding funding for
technology devices requires an individualized
approach. To begin your search, check out resources
that are available to you locally, such as the Lions
or Kiwanis Clubs, and religious organizations.
Nationally, the Easter Seal Society in connection
with IBM has an assistance project that allows
eligible persons with disabilities to purchase
discounted computer systems. Additional funding
sources may soon emerge with new federal legislation
and more national interest in technology by insurance
companies.
To really make technology work for you and your
child, it is important to become an informed
consumer. Use the abundant resources available; read
about technology, talk to others who use it, and try
out various technology options before you buy.
References
Budoff, M., Thormann, J., & Gras, A. (1985).
Origins of the species computer. In Microcomputers in
Special Education (pp. 13-25). Cambridge, MA:
Brookline Books.
Hawkridge, D., Vincent, T., & Hales, G. (1985).
What is new information technology? In New Education
Technology in the Education of Disabled Children and
Adults (pp. 41-52). San Diego, CA: College-Hill
Press.
McWilliams, P.A. (1984). Where did they come from and
what do they want? In Personal Computers and the
Disabled (pp. 35-40). Garden City, NY: Quantum
Press/Doubleday.
Back to top
by Julie Fleisch,
Seattle, Washington
Last year my son, Colin, lost a tooth at school as
the speech therapist was feeding him his lunch. She
told him he should take it home and put it under his
pillow for the tooth fairy. The conversation
continued with the therapist asking Colin about the
tooth fairy. "Does the tooth fairy come to your
house?" Colin pointed to YES on his wheelchair
tray. "Does the tooth fairy come to visit your
sister?" YES. "Has the tooth fairy ever
come to see you?" NO. When the speech therapist
related this conversation to me, I felt so
neglectful. I know my son so well yet I had assumed
he didn't understand the whole tooth fairy
concept. Colin has surprised me many times with his
understanding and observations of his world; a world
he has trouble interacting with.
His world is a little different than the one most
children live in. Colin has cerebral palsy. He is
unable to walk yet gets around on his knees, in his
wheelchair, and on an adapted tricycle. He is also
non-verbal and relies on an alphabet board -- both
manual and programmed varieties -- to spell out
messages. Through his spelling boards we are slowly
unlocking some doors for him. He has so many
limitations yet so many abilities, the conflict
between the two being the biggest challenge for those
who work with him. How do we deal with the
limitations so that the abilities can be used?
When Colin was born nine years ago, my husband and I
had no idea how complicated our life was to become.
Our resources have been stretched and our plans
altered drastically. We started adapting things and
purchasing special equipment for him when he was very
young. Because we fall in an economic bracket that
does not allow us financial assistance for Colin, we
have learned to be very creative. I carry an Allen
wrench in my purse and can do almost anything with
velcro. There have been a long list of needs and a
variety of ways we have tried to meet those needs.
Our experiences have brought forth, for me, some
major areas of concern for families who have
children, like Colin, with high needs for assistive
devices and technology. Where do families find the
financial resources to meet their child's needs?
Who do parents go to for help? And how do parents
keep up with the ever-evolving technical knowledge so
that they can make wise and appropriate decisions?
The funding issues are very challenging for schools
and programs that work with special kids. They are
even more difficult for families. This is one of the
stresses that affects families that already have
enough stress to deal with. The paperwork that
accompanies insurance claims and the type of coverage
most families can afford is part of the problem. The
other part is finding the funding when insurance
doesn't provide coverage. We have purchased many
things for Colin and have constructed many more
ourselves because we couldn't afford to purchase
them. I sometimes envy the lower income families
because they actually have better funding with the
state and federal assistance than families who
don't qualify financially. We built Colin his
early chairs and standers and did a lot with loaned
equipment from other facilities and families. When we
wanted to buy him a computer and the adaptions to run
it, we chose to get community assistance. A letter
was written and mailed out to local organizations. We
received the funding and made some nice connections
in the community. We did, however, have to put Colin
on display at fund raisers, a concept that I
didn't care for. When we ordered Colin's big
mobility system and communication device four years
ago, our choice was made with funding being an
important factor. Our insurance would cover the power
chair but not the communication system. So we put
them together for ordering purposes and used the
communication system to drive the chair. We ended up
not getting the mobility system Colin could operate
easily by doing this but how else could we fund a
very expensive communication system, and who covers
the cost of the ramp needed to get the chair into our
home or the van and lift to transport him?
Families need someone to go to for help in managing
their funding concerns. A lot of time and energy is
used up and compromises are sometimes made that are
not in the best interest of the children. In their
effort to find the right equipment, parents are often
placed in a position of making decisions without
knowing all the options. Relying on the equipment
companies to provide information or using the
expertise of a salesman only adds to their dilemma
and confusion as they are obviously biased.
Maintenance and repair of the equipment becomes a
problem if a product is chosen that is not carried by
the company that services the area in which the
family lives. It is important for parents to find
assistance from someone who can show them a variety
of systems and can listen to their needs and
concerns. I think a trial period on the equipment is
a good idea. Some vendors will allow the family to
try the equipment for a week or a month. This gives
the families a chance to become familiar with the
device and actually see if the child can learn to use
it. Otherwise parents may spend thousands of dollars
on equipment their child will never use.
The other issue is "how do we keep up?"
Technology is moving ahead at such a rapid rate that
it is overwhelming for non-professionals. Classes in
computer technology that I took five years ago, are
not valid anymore as the devices I learned about are
almost obsolete. For teachers and therapists without
access to major hospitals or treatment centers
specializing in children with disabilities, it is
very hard to be knowledgeable about current
technology. Families may find it very difficult to
keep up without major expenditures of time, energy
and money.
In a time when there is a lot of talk about case
managers and family empowerment, these questions are
important to ask. Is the concept of a technology
advocate being addressed? This could be a person who
has current knowledge of assistive technology and can
help families to select systems by explaining all the
options available. The advocate could also assist
families in learning how to use the equipment and
handle maintenance issues and routines for usage.
Funding strategies could be explored by someone
besides the parents thus decreasing stress and
protecting the family's privacy and self-esteem.
Maybe families could avoid some of the pitfalls that
come with high-tech answers to very emotion-filled
problems.
The whole idea of technology for kids, little kids,
is an exciting yet emotional subject. So many things
can be accomplished with computers. This can give
children the power of speech, the ability to produce
written materials, to manipulate pages, to control
their environment in many different ways and to
compete with their peers. How exciting this is for
the parents of children with otherwise little ability
to be involved. I remember how exciting this whole
area was for me four years ago, as we prepared for
and finally ordered the "big system" for
Colin. I thought this would be the answer to all of
our frustrations and limitations. Finally, Colin
could feel some independence and things could be more
normal.
But technology is not the sole answer. Without it,
Colin has little chance but with it the chance is
only slightly better. The bottom line is that it
takes a lot of commitment and follow-through on the
part of parents, teachers, and everyone who works
with a child. These assistive devices are only the
beginning of a long road to independence, not the
end. It takes a tremendous amount of work and
coordinated effort to make it usable. Indeed,
sometimes it seems like more work and hassle to use
the technology than to use the more convenient manual
boards and eye pointing strategies we were used to.
These strategies are always available, do not need to
be programmed, turned on, or have their batteries
charged. It reminds me of an afternoon, recently,
that we spent at a children's center nearby doing
trials and assessment on communication systems with
Colin. The therapists there had set out and
programmed three different devices for us to try.
They put them in front of Colin who was excited with
all three and they worked and played for several
hours. When, at last, they were finished and had
removed the array of keyboards and monitors, exposing
Colin's own manual alphabet on the wheelchair
tray, Colin began to spell in earnest. The experts
sat and watched intently as he very clearly and
urgently spelled out P-O-T-T-Y. The message had not
been programmed into any of the fancy systems that
had been covering his tray. We need to work on both
manual systems that offer convenience and tech
systems that offer advancement and independence.
Technology can't do the job alone.
I have, thus, learned not to put all my eggs in one
basket, so to speak. We need to work on many fronts
if we are to get the success we want for our
children. Technology is just one of those fronts. We
need to spend as much time teaching our children to
have self-esteem, to have appropriate social skills,
to be survivors, to care about others, to be able to
communicate basic wants on their own in case the
system breaks downs, to be able to protect themselves
and to be happy with their lives. We also need to
teach the rest of the world to be accepting and
tolerant. We need to prepare a place for our children
to live as adults.
We taught Colin to make choices and the choice he
made four years ago was not to use the "big
system" we had chosen for him. In all our
excitement to purchase the technology for him we had
forgotten to look at how he wanted to operate such a
system. We purchased him a head pointing system and
he wanted to touch with his hands. He would just put
his head down and tune us out. I still believe this
was a good device for Colin's body. He had less
tone in his whole body, less drooling, and the
capacity for more speed in his responses. There must
have been something about it that he couldn't
deal with. All the assessments, videotapings, and
discussions had dealt with the right components but
not with the whole child. What about his need to
directly visualize choicemaking and his growing need
to manipulate things with his hands? I have learned
that we need to look at factors other than the
obvious, testable, measurable ones. Maybe we need to
include our children, even the children who do not
seem to have the ability to understand the process,
in our decision making and to respect whatever input
they can give us.
Another factor that makes technology especially
difficult for young children is our inability to
predict the future. I look at my son's growth and
maturation as being more of an evolution. His
disabilities mask so much. As we slowly work our way
through the things that limit what he can do, we
discover more and more about what he is able to do. I
am amazed, as well, at how many unpredictable factors
are in his life. Just changing his medications or
even the dosages, alters not only his body but, more
subtly, his personality and his cognitive
performance. How can we choose a very expensive piece
of sophisticated equipment with the hope that it will
last him ten years? I have no idea what Colin will be
like in ten years or even next year. We can't
wait to offer him the advantages of technology
though. We have to deal with now and sort of bank on
the the future.
But I have confidence that he'll do everything we
expect him to do and probably more. Every chance
Colin has to do things on his own he takes. He taught
himself to read and to tell time. Last week, he
indicated on his alphabet broad that he wanted to
watch SCOOBY DOO on TV. We should know better than to
question his memory but we looked in the TV directory
to see if it was on. Sure enough, it was just
starting. So, to let him know he was right, we showed
him the directory. Now he wants to look at the
directory every day to see what s on. We have done
all we can think of to give him a sense of control in
his life. Giving him the power to communicate his
wants has been wonderful, but communicating at a
higher level has been even better. The day he said
SORRY after he had screamed uncontrollably about
something, or the first MOMMY and I LOVE YOU are
treasures for us. What a wonderful thing; to be able
to express thoughts and feelings. He even tells jokes
and laughs. Thank goodness we could unlock some of
those doors for him. Last night, after several
helpings of dinner, Colin looked up and grinned.
M-M-M-DELICIOUS MR PIG ALL DONE. I'm afraid not,
Mr. Colin you're not all done by a long way!
Back to top
by Roxanne Rice, J.D.
National Information Center for Children and Youth
with Disabilities (NICHCY)
Washington, DC
The legislation discussed below outlines the federal
government's recognition "...that for all
individuals, technology can provide important tools
for making the performance of tasks quicker and
easier, but for some individuals with disabilities,
assistive technology is a necessity that enables them
to engage in or perform many tasks." (OSERS NEWS
In Print, 2(1), 1989). For more information about any
of these laws, contact your State Education Agency,
State Developmental Disability Council, State
Protection and Advocacy Agency, parent or disability
group, or write to NICHCY. In addition, single copies
of these laws may be obtained, usually for about $1,
by writing to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.
Information may also be available by contacting your
Congressional Representative.
I. 1986 Amendments to the Rehabilitation Act (P.L.
99-506)
Title I of the Rehabilitation Act authorizes over one
billion dollars to the states to provide
rehabilitation services including evaluation,
counseling, training, placement and rehabilitative
technology services to individuals who qualify for
vocational rehabilitation services.
The 1986 Amendments require that states receiving
funds available under this Act must "describe
how rehabilitation engineering services will be
provided to assist an increasing number of
individuals with handicaps."
The Amendments also include a definition of
rehabilitation technology services as "the
systematic application of technology, engineering
methodologies, or scientific principles to meet needs
of individuals with handicaps in areas which include
education, rehabilitation, employment,
transportation, independent living, and
recreation."
The law requires that in assessing an
individual's potential for rehabilitation
services, rehabilitation engineering services should
be explored. In addition, part of the Individual
Written Rehabilitation Plan (IWRP) should include,
where appropriate, a statement on the benefits of
rehabilitation technology services for the
individual's rehabilitation goals.
II. Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of
Rights Act Amendments of 1987 (P.L. 100-146)
The Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of
Rights Act requires that all funded services be aimed
at providing opportunities and assistance for persons
with developmental disabilities to allow them to
"achieve their maximum potential through
increased independence, productivity and integration
into the community."
The 1987 Amendments require that each state submit an
annual report including descriptions of the currently
unavailable assistive technology services which could
be of benefit to persons with developmental
disabilities.
Funds authorized under this Act may be used for
planning, advocacy, systems change, and direct
services. These direct services may include assistive
technology services.
III. Education of the Handicapped Act (P.L. 94-142)
and the 1986 Amendments to the Act (P.L. 99-457)
The Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA) requires
that states provide a free, appropriate, public
education, including related services, for all
children with disabilities from ages 5 to 21. The
1986 Amendments to the Act require that states
provide special education and related services to
children from 3 to 5 years of age no later than the
1991 school year, and establishes a new, voluntary
state grant program for providing early intervention
services for infants and toddlers with disabilities
(ages birth to 2 years).
The law requires that each child receiving special
education and related services must have an
Individualized Education Program (IEP) or an
Individualized Family Services Plan (IFSP, for
children birth to ages two), designed to meet their
uinique needs. The IEP or IFSP should reflect the
assistive technology needs of the child.
Part G of the Act authorizes the Secretary of
Education to make grants or enter into agreements
with appropriate institutions to advance the use of
new technologies, media and materials used in
educating students with disabilities.
States differ on the issue of providing assistive
technology under the Act. Some states do provide
technology-related assistance as part of related
services, while other states have made no such
provisions.
IV. Elementary and Secondary School Improvement Act
of 1987 (P.L. 100-297)
This Act is a consolidation of legislation on
programs for elementary and secondary education. A
number of the amendments are designed to conform the
Act more closely with the Education of the
Handicapped Act. This includes the P.L. 99-457
requirement for early intervention services to
children between birth and age 2.
The Act allows states to use authorized funds for
programs which may include the acquisition of
equipment and instructional materials. Funds may
additionally be used for training in the use of
assistive devices and other specialized
equipment.
V. Social Security Act, Budget Reconciliation Act of
1986 (P.L. 99-509)
A. Medicaid. Medicaid funds
provide medical services to qualifying individuals.
States are required to provide certain basic medical
services but can elect to cover other services as
well.
Assistive technology devices are covered only if they
fit into the Medicaid definition of a prosthetic
device. Prosthetic devices are defined as
replacement, corrective, or supportive devices
prescribed by a physician or other licensed
practitioner. Additional covered services include
"other diagnostic, screening, preventive and
rehabilitative services." This language might be
seen as including assistive technology devices and
services. States differ greatly in what they will
cover in this area. Some states allow Medicaid funds
to be used for augmentative communication devices.
Other states will not allow funds to be used for
equipment they do not consider to be a prosthetic
device.
Individuals in active treatment in an Intermediate
Care Facility for the Mentally Retarded and other
related conditions may be eligible for assistive
technology services under Medicaid regulations.
Active treatment could include mechanical supports to
achieve proper positioning, toilet and bathing
facilities, communication aids, and other
devices.
B. Maternal and Child Health
Services Block Grant (Title V). Maternal and
Child Health Services funds may be used by each state
for its own priorities. Many services may be funded
including: early identification and intervention
services, diagnostic and evaluation services, family
support services and "medical, surgical, and
corrective services." Some states are currently
using Maternal and Child Health Services funds for
adaptive equipment and assistive devices including
wheelchairs for children with disabilities.
VI. Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals
with Disabilities Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-407)
Citing the inadequacies of available access, trained
personnel, and financing in the area of assistive
technology, Congress enacted P.L. 100-407 with the
purpose of extending the availability of assistive
technology to individuals with disabilities and their
families. "
Assistive technology device" is defined by the
bill as "any item, piece of equipment, or
product system whether acquired off the shelf,
modified or customized that is used to increase,
maintain, or improve functional capabilities of
individuals with disabilities." The broad
definition of devices and individuals included under
this law gives states great flexibility in the
programs to be developed.
Title I provides states with funds to develop a
consumer responsive state system of assistive
technology services. States receiving funds may
develop or carry out any of the following:
-
model delivery systems;
-
state-wide needs assessment;
-
support groups;
-
public awareness programs;
-
training and technical assistance;
-
access to related information;
-
interagency agreements; and
-
other activities necessary for developing,
implementing, or evaluating a state-wide service
delivery system.
Nine states have successfully competed for funds.
Twenty additional states could be added in 1990 with
the remainder to be added in 1991.
Title II of P.L. 100-407 authorizes the federal
government to perform various activities to assist
the states in the development of their service
delivery systems. These activities include: a study
to be undertaken by the National Council on
Disability to identify practices which facilitate or
impede financing of assistive technology devices and
services; and, a study of the need for a National
Information and Programs Referral Network to assist
states to respond to technology-related information
needs.
In the Fall of 1989, nine states were awarded funding
to plan and establish statewide programs of
technology-related assistance. These states included:
Arkansas, Colorado, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine,
Maryland, Minnesota, Nebraska, and Utah. For contact
information about these programs in your state,
contact the Center for Special Education Technology,
or the Association for the Advancement of
Rehabilitation Technology (RESNA).
In addition to the state awards, the National
Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research
(NIDRR) awarded a contract to RESNA, an
interdisciplinary association for the advancement of
rehabilitation and assistive technology, to provide
technical assistance and information to States on the
development and implementation of a
consumer-responsive statewide program of
technology-related assistance under this law. For
more information, contact RESNA (703) 524-6686.
Understanding and becoming aware of the laws relating
to assistive technology can make a significant
difference in how, where, and when you gain access to
these services. For a listing of any of the groups
mentioned in your area, contact NICHCY and ask for a
State Resource Sheet.
1996 Note: This overview of the laws is quite out
of date. For more current information on the laws
-
where significant advances have taken place in
terms of addressing the needs that children with
disabilities may have for assistive technoology
devices, please contact NICHCY and ask for copies
of:
-
News Digest 15: The Education of Children and Youth
with Special Needs: What Do the Laws Say?
-
News Digest 21: Questions and Answers about the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
-
Transition Summary 8: Transition Services in the
IEP
Each of these documents provides current information
on children's rights to request and obtain
assistive technology devices to meet their special
needs.
Back to top
by Mary L. Wilds
Coordinator
Technical Assistance Center #3
George Mason University
Fairfax, Virginia
Computer technology for young children has only
recently been recommended for use in the home and
applied on a large-scale in early childhood special
education programs. Available technology and
information about its use with young children has
lagged behind that available to other groups for a
variety of reasons, such as: the high cost of
hardware, a limited amount of developmentally
appropriate software, limited funds to investigate
the potential of computers as a teaching tool, lack
of skill on the part of professionals in creating a
range of response modes, lack of training and skill
in computer use by early childhood special educators
and parents, and the fear that technology would
overshadow the human aspects of early intervention
(Berhmann, 1988; Hutinger, 1986).
In the past several years, however, changes have
occurred which have made computer technology more
accessible to early childhood educators, therapists,
parents, and children. Equipment is now more
affordable, a wide range of developmentally
appropriate software is available, and a variety of
response modes have been developed which allow almost
any child to access a computer (Burkhart, 1980;
Charlebois-Marois, 1985; Goossens & Crain, 1987).
Publications and training have made early childhood
educators, therapists, and parents more aware of the
potential impact computers can have on infants and
young children. The appropriate application of
technology can assist families and professionals in
learning about a child's capabilities. As more
educators and therapists have successfully
incorporated computer use in their early intervention
and preschool programs and as parents begin using
computers in their homes, there has been a growing
acceptance of the belief that technology can serve to
enhance, not supplant, one-to-one interaction with
infants and toddlers (Lazzari & Wilds, 1989).
Skills for Interactive Use of Computers
Special educators and therapists using computers in
their programs have learned that when some beginning
skills are introduced, computers become less complex
devices for preschoolers (Rettig, 1987). Introducing
these skills can reduce the natural tendency for a
young child positioned in front of the computer to
bang on the keyboard and possibly become frustrated
and lose interest in approaching the computer again
or learning that the computer is a toy to react too,
not interact with. With this awareness, parents and
educators begin to think of the computer as more than
a pacifier to keep children quiet. The primary aim
should be to allow young children with disabilities
access to the assistive technology which will be most
appropriate to their needs and to provide for the
maximum participation of the young child in social
and educational environments. To reach this goal,
many skills may be necessary for using this
technology effectively. For families and programs
with limited funds, these skills can be developed
without access to expensive computers or technology
devices. The following is a list of some of the
beginning skills that should be considered. This list
is intended to assist parents, educators, and
therapists in adapting the computer's use to the
child's current level of skills. Keep in mind
that not all children will need total mastery of all
of these skills. With some children, these skills can
be developed simultaneously with the computer and
adult intervention. Each child should be individually
assessed to determine the potential benefits of
technology.
Motor Skills
-
range of motion
-
press and release
-
reliable and consistent motor movement
Visual/Perceptual Skills
-
visual tracking and scanning
-
figure ground
-
form discrimination
Cognitive/Language skills
-
cause and effect
-
attention span (sustained or selective)
-
object permanence
-
means/end causality
-
imitation
-
one-to-one correspondence
-
intentional behavior (desire to communicate)
-
symbolic representation (recognize pictures)
-
reliable yes/no response
-
receptive understanding of commands
-
making choices
Social/Emotional Skills
-
initiating and terminating interactions
-
turn taking and waiting for turn
-
attending to an object or person
-
following one-step directions
This list of skills may initially seem overwhelming,
unrelated, or overly simple; yet these skills are
included in most preschool checklists and taught
using other materials. In addition, these skills can
be introduced and taught by using simple and
inexpensive toys and switches. Toys and switches are
concrete objects that are naturally motivating to
young children. Many battery operated toys can be
used to teach a young child many of these skills, and
any toy operated by batteries can be adapted for
switch activation. By adapting toys for use to
introduce and teach these beginning skills, teachers,
therapists, and parents can help a young child
prepare to use computers and other assistive
technology. Once children have some experiences with
toys and switches, they are better prepared to have
successful interactions with the computer.
How to Select Battery Operated Toys and Switches
The importance of play for very young children cannot
be overemphasized. For children who have a physical
disability or who are generally uninterested in
manipulative toys, battery operated toys that are
adapted to work with single switches can be used.
Battery operated toys and switches can be the tools
for developing play skills with objects and with
peers. They also provide children with physical
disabilities increased control over the classroom and
home environment (Musselwhite, 1986).
Selecting toys and switches for young preschool-aged
children requires that parents, teachers, and
therapists consider several important factors. The
most important factor is to become an expert. Make a
list of your young child's strengths and needs
and choose toys which meet your child's
requirements. Collect information from parent support
groups, toy lending libraries, information centers,
manufacturers, and through exchanges with other
parents, teachers, therapists, and others.
(Additional resources are listed at the end of this
NEWS DIGEST.)
When purchasing battery operated toys, it is
important to remember that there are different kinds
of toys. It is important to consider a variety of
battery operated toys that reflect a range of sensory
inputs. For example, toys with flashing and
multicolored lights provide visual input; tape
recorders, musical, and other noisy toys (e.g.,
animal sounds, sirens) stimulate a young child's
auditory senses. Blowing fans and vibrating toys
provide tactile and vibro-tactile input. Toys should
also provide for a variety of movement patterns:
stationary, horizontal, vertical, and circular
movement. Examples include a drumming bear, a walking
robot, a fireman go-ing up and down a ladder, and
small train or car track sets. Toys should be chosen
that can be easily incorporated into play routines
(Musselwhite, 1986), as well as for their motivation
and age appropriateness to the individual child
(Greszko, 1988).
As with the purchase of toys, the teacher, therapist,
and parent should acquire a variety of switches that
can be used with children on different developmental
levels and physical skills. Finding an appropriate
switch or switches that match the child's
physical requirements is extremely important. The
child must have a reliable motor movement that can
consistently activate the toy. As the child becomes
more capable, the more reliable motor movements
available to activate switches will provide a means
of more efficiently interacting with his or her
environment. Recent technology (Greszko, 1988) has
provided a variety of mechanisms for these children
to activate toys other than simply using a switch
activated by a press of the hand. For example,
children can use an eye-blink switch or a puff switch
to activate a device. Pressure sensitive switches
that require only a minimal amount of movement are
now on the market. Voice activation of devices is
also now possible.
Computer Application
Once children have a variety of experiences with toys
and switches, they are often better prepared to have
more successful interactions, not reactions, to the
computer. A wide variety of appropriate and
inexpensive software is now available for
preschoolers. Software for microcomputers generally
falls along traditional academic and readiness
domains and uses color, graphics, animation, sound,
and voice synthesis for this population. When
introducing computers to very young children with
disabilities who have been exposed to the toys and
switches noted previously, it is important to
minimize the number of new concepts and skills. Most
of this software is written for the Apple II series
of computers, which is the computer available in most
schools. This software can be used with a variety of
peripheral devices that are appropriate for
preschoolers. The keyboard is very busy, and young
children are easily distracted or unable to focus on
a limited selection of keys that activate the
computer. Commonly available peripheral devices
include touch monitors, adapted keyboards and touch
pads, voice activation, and switch interfaces. The
TouchWindow by Personal Touch is a touch-sensitive
screen that is placed over the monitor. This screen
allows the child to use direct selection, touching
the monitor, to activate the software. Touch pads
include the Muppet Learning Keys by Sunburst and the
Power Pad by Dunamis. These pads can be modified into
single or multiple switches and adapted keyboards.
The Muppet Learning Keys, for example, have the
alphabet in order, as well as a ruler that
illustrates numbers, and a watercolor set for color
selection.
Introducing technology to very young children with
disabilities is still quite early in its development.
While there are many obvious potential benefits to
early intervention using this technology, the state
of the art is still not sufficiently advanced to
enable parents and professionals working with these
children to meet their needs easily. However, these
children can be trained in many of the skills
necessary for successful use of computer and
augmentative communication technology without the use
of expensive or complicated equipment. Thus, when
they are physically and developmentally ready to use
available technology, these children will be able to
receive the maximum benefits that technology can make
in quality of life and the ability to learn and to
become as independent as possible.
References
Behrmann, M. (1988). Integrating computers into the
curriculum. Boston, MA: College-Hill Press.
Berhmann, M., Jones, J, & Wilds, M. (1989).
Technology interventions for very young children with
disabilities. Infants and Young Children, 1(4),
66-77.
Burkhart, L. (1980). Homemade battery powered toys
and educational devices for severely handicapped
children. College Park, MD: Author.
Burkhart, L. (1982). More homemade battery devices
for severely handicapped children with suggested
activities. College Park, MD: Author.
Charlebois-Marois, C. (1985). Everybody's
technology -- A sharing of ideas in augmentative
communications. Montreal: Charlescoms.
Goossens, C., & Crain, S. (1987). Augmentative
communication -- Assessment resource. Wauconda, IL:
Don Johnston Developmental Equipment.
Greszko, K. (1988). Types of battery operated toys.
Handout developed for the Technical Assistance Center
#3, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
Hutinger, P. (1986). ACCT curriculum. Macomb, IL:
Western Illinois University.
Lazzari, A., & Wilds, M. (1989). Technology in
early childhood special education: Access for rural
programs. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 9(4),
21-24.
Musselwhite, C. (1986). Adaptive play for special
needs children. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
Rettig, M. (1987). Microcomputers in early childhood
special education: Trends and issues. Presented at
the National Early Childhood Conference on Children
with Special Needs, Denver, CO.
Wilds, M. (1988). The future role of
technology/computers in the preschool handicapped
classroom. Paper presented at Council for Exceptional
Children Annual Convention, Washington, DC.
Back to top
by Ruth Bragman
South Atlantic Regional Resource Center
Plantation, FL
Rural Special Education Quarterly, 8(2), 34-38,
1987.
Reprinted with the permission of the publisher,
National Rural Development Institute and the American
Council on Rural Special Education (ACRES),
University of Utah, Department of Special Education,
Milton Bennion Hall, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
The use of this model requires knowledge and
understanding of the technology that is available and
potentially accessible. For the purpose of this model
we have identified and defined broad technological
categories which include, but are not limited to
those described below.
Sensory Enhancers
Sensory enhancers are adaptive/assistive devices
and/or software which allow a sensory-deficient
student access to the environment through the use of
technology. Individuals in the following categories
can be served: hard of hearing, deaf, speech
impaired, visually handicapped, seriously emotionally
disturbed, orthopedically impaired, other health
impaired, deaf-blind, multihandicapped, and specific
learning disabled. Following are examples of types of
sensory enhancers:
-
audio output devices
-
braille writers (input/output)
-
character magnification devices
-
digitizers
-
electronic scanners (with speech synthesizers)
-
eye movement detectors/eye sensor devices
-
voice analyzers and recognizers.
Keyboard Adaptation and Emulators
Keyboard adaptations are alternatives to using the
standard keyboard to input data. Keyboard emulators
are peripheral products that make the computer
"think" that its own keyboard is being
used. Examples of keyboard adaptions/emulators are:
-
alternative key pads (sketch pad, graphic pad)
-
bar code scanners
-
fist/foot keyboard
-
firmward card
-
joy stick
-
key guard
-
light pen
-
membrane keyboard
-
mouse
-
touch screen.
Environmental Controls and Manipulators
Environmental controls and manipulators modify the
operation of a device to compensate for environmental
restrictions due to a student's handicap. Some
examples of environmental controls and manipulators
are:
-
adaptations of timers, light switches,
telephone/radio amplifiers, headphones, buzzers
(environmental control systems)
-
control mechanisms with sonar sensing devices
-
pressure plates
-
robotics
-
additional external switches and sensors (eyebrow
switch, breath switch, pressure switch)
-
telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDDs).
Instructional Uses of Technology
Instructional uses of technology are those which
utilize software and/or related applications of
technology which allow the student full educational
opportunity. Examples of the instructional uses of
technology are:
-
Computer-assisted instruction (software for drill
and practice, simulations, tutorials,
demonstrations, problem-solving)
-
computer-managed instruction (tracking and
placement, grading display and analysis,
scheduling, and various information management
tasks)
-
computer-supported activities (word processing,
data bases, spread sheets, utilities)
-
video disks
-
telecommunications
-
alternative languages (LOGO).
Motivational Devices
Motivational devices encourage the student to
interact with his/her environment through
exploration, manipulation, and play. Two motivational
devices are:
-
battery operated devices
-
modifications of toys and games.
Student Assessment/Evaluation Considerations
The student assessment/evaluation process, as
outlined in Public Law 94-142, Section 300.532,
states that "...the child is assessed in all
areas related to the suspected disability, including,
where appropriate, health, vision, hearing, social
and emotional status, general intelligence, academic
performance, communication status, and motor
abilities." In addition to the traditional
assessment and evaluation of students, the use of
technology to facilitate maximum handicapped student
potential needs to be considered.
1996 Note: The Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA), the 1990 amendment to P.L.
94-142, specifically states that a student's need
for assistive technology devices and services is to
be considered and addressed when his or her
Individualized Education Program is planned. These
devices and services can be provided by the school as
either a part of special education or as a related
services.
The traditional evaluation focuses on the
identification of the nature of the handicapping
condition so that appropriate services may be made
available. This evaluation usually provides
information regarding the student's current
educational functioning so that an intervention
program, which is tailored to the needs of the
student, can be developed. Evaluation procedures are
in accordance with Sections 300.530-300.534, which
state that "...tests are selected and
administered so as to best ensure that when a test is
administered to a child with impaired sensory,
manual, or speaking skills, the test results
accurately reflect the child's aptitude or
achievement level or whatever other factors the test
purports to measure, rather then reflecting the
child's impaired sensory, manual, or speaking
skills (except where those skills are the factors
which the test purports to measure)..."
Technological considerations augment the traditional
evaluation by providing information about the
student's ability to access and use technology.
Inclusion of technological considerations helps to
ensure that there has been a total review of the
nature of the handicapping condition. Technological
considerations should be an integral part of the
student assessment/evaluation process so that the IEP
reflects the unique needs of the handicapped student.
The following questions identify content of
traditional assessment/evaluation reporting and
suggests the addition of questions which would
support technological considerations. Traditional and
Technological Considerations
Health
Traditional: Does the student
have any acute, subacute, or chronic health problems?
Does the student have a progressive and/or
degenerative condition?
Technological: Given the
student's attendance record, could the use of
technology allow the student more continuous access
to school and the curricula? How can technology be
used to compensate for the effects of a degenerative
condition?
Visual
Traditional: What is the
student's visual acuity? What is the
student's tracking ability?
Technological: What kinds of
physical adaptions need to be made to allow the
student to access technology? How will technology
allow the student to utilize compensatory senses;
i.e., could a student use a magnified screen or does
s/he need large print on the screen? Is the student
able to discriminate presented visual stimuli? Would
speech-produced input facilitate learning?
Hearing
Traditional: Is there a decibel
loss? How will the decibel loss affect the student s
ability to learn?
Technological: What adaptions
will allow the student access to the instructional
program; i.e., how can technology (micro-computer,
software, and a voice entry system) help to produce
vocalization training? Would speech output facilitate
learning? Is the student able to discriminate
presented auditory stimuli?
Social and emotional status
Traditional: How does the
student respond to differing social situations? What
are the student's basic character traits?
Technological: What is the
positive/negative psychological impact of the use of
a computer with certain students; i.e., how will the
student who has normal intelligence, but no means of
expressive communication, deal with the use of a
computer to provide his/her voice? What is the impact
of the use of technology to the environment, peers,
class?
General intelligence
Traditional: How does the
student perform on a standard IQ test? What is the
student's potential for learning?
Technological: Does the student
have the ability or will the student develop the
ability for higher cognitive functions that will
allow for conceptualization, symbolization,
generalization and abstraction; i.e., will the
student be able to understand cause/effect
relationships when making a selection on the
computer, causing it to output information? Does the
student have the notion of causality and the desire
to bring about an effect? Does the student have the
cognitive ability to learn and remember the use and
operation of given devices? Does the student have
symbolic functioning; i.e., the ability to associate
a symbol or set of symbols with units of experience?
Academic performance
Traditional: How does the
student perform on a wide range of screening measures
which reflect achievement?
Technological: How can the
current level of achievement be affected by the use
of technology; i.e., how will the use of drill and
practice, educational games, simulation,
demonstrations, tutorials, problem-solving, word
processing, information search and retrieval,
graphics, and/or spread sheets, affect academic
performance? Will the use of technology affect the
speed of learning? Will the probability of the
learner achieving his/her goals and objectives set
forth in the curriculum be increased?
Communication status
Traditional: What is the
student's receptive and expressive language
ability? Does the student have any problems with
voice, articulation, and fluency which affect the
production of spoken language?
Technological: What is the
relationship between the student's level of
expressive and receptive language; i.e., how will the
use of technology affect the student's ability to
communicate? What skills are present (spoken,
incomprehensible but consistent, written, speed of
communication with and without device)? What is the
present language structure (nonvocal from birth,
nonvocal from injury)? Does the student understand
the intent to communicate? What is the symbolic level
of functioning? How will speech output affect the
student?
Motor abilities
Traditional: What are the
student's abilities in gross motor and fine motor
skills?
IBM Corp. Special Needs Systems, 11400 Burnet Rd.,
Internal zip 9466, Austin, TX, 78758. Telephone:
(800) 426-4832 (Voice); (800) 426-4833 (TT).
IBM's Special Needs Systems provides information
on what assistive technology is available.
Information for persons with disabilities affecting
learning, hearing, speech and language, mobility, and
vision is provided, including vendor and support
group names, addresses, and descriptions.
RESNA, 1700 N. Moore Street, Suite 1540, Arlington,
VA 22209. Telephone: (703) 524-6686. RESNA is
currently operating a Technical Assistance Project,
which can help callers identify the program in their
state that is responsible for providing information,
training, and technical assistance on assistive
technology to individuals with disabilities.
Technical Aids and Assistance for the Disabled Center
(TAAD), 1950 West Roosevelt Road, Chicago, IL 60608.
Telephone: (312) 421-3373 (Voice/TT); (800) 346-2939
(Voice). TAAD is an organization created by the
Committee on Personal Computers and the Handicapped
(COPH-2) to provide options in using personal
computer technology to persons wtih disabilities. The
TADD Center provides advocacy and services with an
emphasis on selection and application of
micro-computers. TADD can also refer callers to their
local resource center of the Alliance for Technology
Access.
Trace Research and Development Center, S-151 Waisman
Center, 1500 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705.
Telephone: (608) 262-6966 (Voice); (608) 263-5408
(TT). The Center is primarily concerned with research
and development in the areas of augmentative
communication (conversation and writing) and computer
access for persons with physical disabilities. The
Center does not manufacture or distribute equipment,
but will make referrals to specific sources of
information regarding equipment, software, service
centers, related profes-sionals, and other
information networks. Publications include the Trace
Resource Book, a reference volume listing and
describing currently available products for
communication, control, and computer access for
persons with disabilities. All information is
available in alternative formats for individuals
unable to read or handle print mateerials.
NEWS DIGEST is published three times a year.
Individual subscriptions in the United States are
free. In addition, NICHCY disseminates other
materials, and can respond to individual inquiries.
Single copies of NICHCY materials and information
services are provided free of charge. For further
information and assistance, or to receive a NICHCY
Publications List, contact NICHCY, P.O. Box 1492,
Washington, DC 20013, or call 1-800-695-0285.
NICHCY thanks our Project Officer, Sara Conlon, at
the Office of Special Education Programs, U.S.
Department of Education, for her time in reading and
reviewing this document. We also thank the entire
staff from the Center for Special Education
Technology, at the Council for Exceptional Children
for their expenditure of time and for providing their
expertise in developing the manuscript.
We also thank the following individuals for their
thoughtful review of this issue: Rhona Hartman (HEATH
Resource Center) and Karen Franklin (Association for
the Advancement of Rehabilitation Technology). We
also thank the many authors and publishers for
allowing us to reprint articles, and for contributing
original manuscripts presented in this issue.
Finally, we thank the National Easter Seal Society
for permission to reprint the photographs used in
this issue.
PROJECT STAFF
Project Director: Carol Valdivieso
Deputy Director: Suzanne Ripley
Editor : Richard Horne
This information is copyright free, unless otherwise
indicated. Readers are encouraged to copy and share
it, but please credit the National Information Center
for Children and Youth with Disabilities (NICHCY).
Please share your ideas and feedback with our staff
by writing to the Editor.
This document was originally produced under
Cooperative Agreement #G0087C3051 between Interstate
Research Associates, Inc., and the Office of Special
Education Programs. Its availability on the Internet
and the listing of updated resources are made
possible through Cooperative Agreement #H030A30003
between the Academy for Educational Development and
the Office of Special Education Programs. The
contents of this publication do not necessarily
reflect the views or policies of the Department of
Education, nor does mention of trade names,
commercial products or organizations imply
endorsement by the U. S. Government.
The Academy for Educational Development, founded in
1961, is an independent, nonprofit service
organization committed to addressing human
development needs in the United States and throughout
the World. In partnership with its clients, the
Academy seeks to meet today's social, economic,
and environmental challenges through education and
human resource development; to apply state-of-the-art
education, training, research, technology,
management, behavioral analysis, and social marketing
techniques to solve problems; and to improve
knowledge and skills throughout the world as the most
effective means for stimulating growth, reducing
poverty, and promoting democratic and humanitarian
ideals.
NICHCY
National Information Center for Children and Youth
with Disabilities
P.O. Box 1492
Washington, DC 20013
Telephone: 1-800-695-0285
E-mail:
nichcy@aed.org
URL:
http://www.nichcy.org/
Copyright © 2007 ASGC. All rights
reserved.
Autism Society of Greater Cleveland
P.O. Box 41066, Brecksville, Ohio 44141 (216)
556-4937
|
|